Home
> Initiatives
>
Global Massachusetts
2015
By William H. Guenther and C. Jeffrey Grogan
(published* in the September 18, 2006 edition of the Boston
Business Journal)
As we approach Tuesday's gubernatorial primary, much of the rhetoric
is about jobs and the economy. The campaign creates an opportunity
to debate the Commonwealth's economic future: Massachusetts can
be an international capital and global innovation leader in 2015
— or a second-tier capital with pockets of excellence and
continued slow job growth.
We have a choice. And though we are short on people — the
most important asset — we have the advantages necessary to
win in the international competition for talent, innovation and
jobs, if we choose a pro-growth global economic strategy.
To engage with the new governor and legislative leaders; major
business associations, CEOs, university presidents and civic leaders
developed the Global Massachusetts 2015 initiative to craft
a sector-based talent and innovation strategy that will re-ignite
Massachusetts' global economic leadership in the coming decade.
In their 1993 report, The Competitive Advantage of Massachusetts,
Monitor Group and Harvard Business School Professor Michael Porter
wrote that the Commonwealth's institutions, capacity for innovation,
diversified economy and concentration of talent made it "the envy
of most states and nations." That is still true today.
But our competitive edge is fragile. Other states and nations are
investing aggressively in talent, innovation and alliances between
universities and industry as part of intentional strategies to win.
By 2015, the leading universities in China and India will take
their place among the top 50 world research universities as they
quickly adapt successful western models to Asian cultures. These
institutions take for granted the importance of government-supported
collaborations with industry. Closer to home, North Carolina's re-invention
as an economic powerhouse centered on the Research Triangle is a
product of two decades of strategic industry, education and state
collaboration.
This increased competition is taking its toll. The 2004 Mass Insight/Battelle
Technology Road Map of the state's R&D capacity documented the 10
technology areas where the state has depth and breadth. But the
study also showed Massachusetts is falling behind in talent generation
for key technologies, as measured by degrees granted by our colleges
and universities.
The last time the Commonwealth created a comprehensive economic
strategy was in 1993. Choosing to Compete helped shape
success for much of that decade. In recent years, there have been
a host of important policy initiatives, but no comprehensive plan.
Now is the time to create a vision for economic success in 2015
and beyond by organizing around a talent and innovation strategy.
Such a strategy has four key elements:
• Focus on a small number of opportunities where
we can be a global leader. We can't win at everything.
California, Georgia, Singapore and China have all made strategic
choices about investing in world-class talent clusters. Done right,
private sector and university leaders will develop a short list
of "global challenges" where 1) Massachusetts has demonstrated university
and industry assets; 2) there are local business opportunities and
major export markets; 3) for R&D areas, there is significant
federal and private funding; and 4) we risk losing an advantage
to competitors.
• Develop a talent and education strategy-because
jobs follow talent. Mapping talent needs against targeted
"global challenges" provides a road map for developing, recruiting
and retaining both stars and supporting talent. This will drive
strategies to recruit the talented 22-30 year olds who represent
our future. And it will guide investment in UMass, state and community
colleges and K-12 math and science, shape support for private universities,
and define new ways to adapt the North Carolina model of an integrated
K-16 education system.
• Build regional alliances through higher education/
industry collaborations. We can't succeed globally unless
we've organized locally. The state must expand the John Adams Innovation
Institute model to allow for larger scale funding and create incentives
for local alliances around targeted R&D opportunities.
• Establish global partnerships — we need a
China/India strategy. Too often our corporate executives
and university leaders meet only by chance in Asian airports. We
need to formalize ways to work collaboratively to create global
talent and innovation partnerships and market Massachusetts' assets
and "brand identity."
Global Massachusetts 2015 and its partners will create
the context for a strategy development process this fall. To begin
the dialogue on a 2015 vision and strategy, the Boston Business
Journal will feature articles by prominent business and higher
education leaders over the next three weeks. Global Massachusetts
2015 welcomes your input and ideas.
William Guenther is president of Mass Insight, a technology-based
economic development firm which is managing the Global Massachusetts
2015 initiative. Jeffrey Grogan leads the Regional Economic Competitiveness
team at Monitor Group and is a member of the Global Massachusetts
2015 steering committee.
Gloria Larson, partner, Foley Hoag, and Charles A. Baker, partner,
DLA Piper Rudnick, are co-lead counsels for Global Massachusetts
2015.
*final published version may contain minor edits
|