| |
Global
Massachusetts 2015
Alliance
Projects
Science
& Technology
Infrastructure
Consumer
Confidence
NEWS
EVENTS
& SECTOR WORK GROUP MEETINGS
STEERING
COMMITTEE and SECTOR LEADERSHIP
SPONSORS
AND PARTNERS
Global
Massachusetts 2015 Brochure [pdf]
Goals
& Outcomes [pdf]
World
Class K-12 Math & Science Agenda [pdf]
|
|
Home
> Initiatives
>
Global Massachusetts
2015
Boston, Massachusetts, May 16, 2006 –
Massachusetts clearly has a footprint in the healthcare space. Our
world-class universities have spawned major academic medical centers
and Massachusetts has a solid intellectual infrastructure around
healthcare. We have clearly been a leader.
Massachusetts’ success in the life sciences has not gone
unnoticed, and other places are now mobilized to challenge our leadership,
according to Harvard Pilgrim President and CEO Charles D. Baker.
Speaking at a Mass Insight Corporate Client Briefing held at Partners
Healthcare, Baker noted that many of the Commonwealth’s new
challengers bring with them significantly lower costs and political
environments that make it easier to get things done, resulting in
loss of population and investment for Massachusetts.
Mass Insight’s Annual Economic Competitiveness Survey Report
shows that the public senses the trend and has turned pessimistic
about the Commonwealth’s economic future.
- Only 32% think Massachusetts is more attractive to businesses
than other states; 55% think we’re less attractive. The
results are the most negative in the 10 years Mass Insight has
asked the question.
- 84% are concerned about the impact of lost high-tech jobs.
- 66% say population losses make them concerned about the future
of the state economy, compared to 53% last year.
Baker, who is also a town official, said that with state aid only
at 2001 levels, municipalities have been forced to raise property
taxes, which has only made our problems worse.
He had three recommendations for improving our competitiveness:
- Leverage our academic assets by improving links between higher
education institutions and industry, as our competitors are doing.
- Establish statewide criteria that protect local decision making
but put parameters in place for development and permitting decisions
to ensure the state’s competitiveness.
- Implement the Mass. Taxpayer’s Foundation proposal that
40% of state tax revenue should go to municipalities to ease their
fiscal burden and mitigate property tax increases.
“It’s like a slow leak in the tire,” Baker
said. “But if we spend another 10 years being a difficult
place to get things done, opportunity will have passed us by.”
|
|